From f5d0230db7f61e1494573cbc846177464eb322d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthias Gerstner Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 15:03:38 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] socket.c: don't send signals with root privileges to fix CVE-2025-46805 The CheckPid() function was introduced to address CVE-2023-24626, to prevent sending SIGCONT and SIGHUP to arbitrary PIDs in the system. This fix still suffers from a TOCTOU race condition. The client can replace itself by a privileged process, or try to cycle PIDs until a privileged process receives the original PID. To prevent this, always send signals using the real privileges. Keep CheckPid() for error diagnostics. If sending the actual signal fails later on then there will be no more error reporting. It seems the original bugfix already introduced a regression when attaching to another's user session that is not owned by root. In this case the target sessions runs with real uid X, while for sending a signal to the `pid` provided by the client real uid Y (or root privileges) are required. This is hard to properly fix without this regression. On Linux pidfds could be used to allow safely sending signals to other PIDs as root without involving race conditions. In this case the client PID should also be obtained via the UNIX domain socket's SO_PEERCRED option, though. --- socket.c | 21 +++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/socket.c b/socket.c index 6c3502f..d6621fa 100644 --- a/socket.c +++ b/socket.c @@ -831,6 +831,11 @@ int pid; return UserStatus(); } +static void KillUnpriv(pid_t pid, int sig) { + UserContext(); + UserReturn(kill(pid, sig)); +} + #ifdef hpux /* * From: "F. K. Bruner" @@ -916,14 +921,14 @@ struct win *wi; { Msg(errno, "Could not perform necessary sanity checks on pts device."); close(i); - Kill(pid, SIG_BYE); + KillUnpriv(pid, SIG_BYE); return -1; } if (strcmp(ttyname_in_ns, m->m_tty)) { Msg(errno, "Attach: passed fd does not match tty: %s - %s!", ttyname_in_ns, m->m_tty[0] != '\0' ? m->m_tty : "(null)"); close(i); - Kill(pid, SIG_BYE); + KillUnpriv(pid, SIG_BYE); return -1; } /* m->m_tty so far contains the actual name of the pts device in the @@ -940,19 +945,19 @@ struct win *wi; { Msg(errno, "Attach: passed fd does not match tty: %s - %s!", m->m_tty, myttyname ? myttyname : "NULL"); close(i); - Kill(pid, SIG_BYE); + KillUnpriv(pid, SIG_BYE); return -1; } } else if ((i = secopen(m->m_tty, O_RDWR | O_NONBLOCK, 0)) < 0) { Msg(errno, "Attach: Could not open %s!", m->m_tty); - Kill(pid, SIG_BYE); + KillUnpriv(pid, SIG_BYE); return -1; } #ifdef MULTIUSER if (attach) - Kill(pid, SIGCONT); + KillUnpriv(pid, SIGCONT); #endif #if defined(ultrix) || defined(pyr) || defined(NeXT) @@ -965,7 +970,7 @@ struct win *wi; { write(i, "Attaching from inside of screen?\n", 33); close(i); - Kill(pid, SIG_BYE); + KillUnpriv(pid, SIG_BYE); Msg(0, "Attach msg ignored: coming from inside."); return -1; } @@ -976,7 +981,7 @@ struct win *wi; { write(i, "Access to session denied.\n", 26); close(i); - Kill(pid, SIG_BYE); + KillUnpriv(pid, SIG_BYE); Msg(0, "Attach: access denied for user %s.", user); return -1; } @@ -1294,7 +1299,7 @@ ReceiveMsg() Msg(0, "Query attempt with bad pid(%d)!", m.m.command.apid); } else { - Kill(m.m.command.apid, + KillUnpriv(m.m.command.apid, (queryflag >= 0) ? SIGCONT : SIG_BYE); /* Send SIG_BYE if an error happened */ -- 2.49.0